On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> I agree, but my point is that so far we have no callbacks that differ
>> only in that detail. I accept that we'd probably want to avoid that.
>
> To illustrate what I had in mind, here's a version of your patch that has five
> callers sharing a callback. The patch is against d039fd51f79e, just prior to
> your recent commits.
I don't think RenameRelation() ought to wait until we've taken the
lock before doing this:
+ aclresult = pg_namespace_aclcheck(namespaceId, GetUserId(), ACL_CREATE);
+ if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
+ aclcheck_error(aclresult, ACL_KIND_NAMESPACE,
+ get_namespace_name(namespaceId));
I'm not sure how we can distinguished in a principled way between
permissions checks that must be conducted before locking the relation
and those that can be done afterwards. And I don't really want to
make that distinction, anyhow.
But I see your point, otherwise. What I'm tempted to do is define a
new function RangeVarGetRelidCheckOwner(RangeVar *relation, LOCKMODE
lockmode, bool system_tables_ok) that will arrange to look up the OID,
check that you own it, optionally check that it's not a system table,
and acquire the specified lock. Internally that will call
RangeVarGetRelidExtended() with a callback; the callback arg can be
used to pass through the system_tables_ok flag.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
