On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> So couldn't we use TopTransactionResourceOwner instead of
>> AuxProcessResrouceOwner? I feel a bit uneasy that bootstrap and
>> standalone-backend have *AuxProcess*ResourceOwner.
>
> Since the aux processes aren't running transactions, I didn't think
> that TopTransactionResourceOwner was appropriate. There's also
> a problem for bootstrap and standalone backend cases: those do run
> transactions and therefore create/destroy TopTransactionResourceOwner,
> leaving nothing behind for ShutdownXLOG to use if it tries to use
> that. We need an extra resowner somewhere.
FallbackResourceOwner? DefaultResourceOwner? SessionResourceOwner?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
