On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> I don't disagree with you about any of that. I don't think you disagree
> with my comment either. What I'm not entirely clear on is how consensus
> could be reached. Leaving it dormant for the better part of a year
> certainly doesn't appear to have helped that situation. We've discussed
> having it be part of the main server and having it be a contrib module
> and until about a week ago, I had understood that having it in contrib
> would be preferrable. Based on the recent emails, it appears there's
> been a shift of preference to having it be in-core, but clearly there's
> no time left to do that in this release cycle.
Well, I'm not sure that anyone else here agreed with me on that, and
one person does not a consensus make no matter who it is. The basic
problem here is that we don't seem to have even two people here who
agree on how this ought to be done. The basic dynamic here seems to
be you asking for changes and Abhijit making them but without any real
confidence, and I don't feel good about that. I'm willing to defer to
an emerging consensus here when there is one, but what Abhijit likes
best is not a consensus, and neither is what you like, and neither is
what I like. What we need is some people agreeing with each other.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
