On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I made two more changes:
> 1. introduce newestCommitTs. Original code was using lastCommitXact to
> check that no "future" transaction is asked for, but this doesn't really
> work if a long-running transaction is committed, because asking for
> transactions with a higher Xid but which were committed earlier would
> raise an error.
I'm kind of disappointed that, in spite of previous review comments,
this got committed with extensive use of the CommitTs naming. I think
that's confusing, but it's also something that will be awkward if we
want to add other data, such as the much-discussed commit LSN, to the
facility.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
