Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobUW9NQK7EJkV_0F87bqqq5BSHKiX2+wfthLcy4qA7YvQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 3:08 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> smgrcreate() as we would for most WAL records or whether it should be
> adopting the new system introduced by
> 49d9cfc68bf4e0d32a948fe72d5a0ef7f464944e. I wrote about this concern
> over here:
>
> http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYcUPL+WOJL2ZzhH=zmrhj0iOQ=iCFM0SuYqBbqZEamEg@mail.gmail.com
>
> But apart from that question your adaptations here look reasonable to me.

That commit having been reverted, I committed v6 instead. Let's see
what breaks...

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable SSL library detection via PQsslAttribute
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init