On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> I understand, but I think "pg_rewind" is likely to be misleading to many
> users who will say "but I don't want just to rewind".
>
> I'm not wedded to the name I suggested, but I think we should look at
> possible alternative names. We do have experience of misleading names
> causing confusion (e.g. "initdb").
FWIW, pg_rewind sounds pretty good to me. But maybe I'm just not
understanding what the use case for this, apart from rewinding?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
