On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Mat Arye <mat@timescaledb.com> wrote:
> (I
> want to avoid having to keep backwards-compatibility for all functions in
> future shared-libraries).
Are you sure that's a good idea? It seems like swimming upstream
against the design. I mean, instead of creating a dispatcher library
that loads either v1 or v2, maybe you could just put it all in one
library, add a "v1" or "v2" suffix to the actual function names where
appropriate, and then set up the SQL definitions to call the correct
one. I mean, it's the same thing, but with less chance of the dynamic
loader ruining your day.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
