Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobRhRL9maJywokMqKx-UP_HyHCdezgqagY7yJYomWwcjg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:15 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com> writes:
> > I'm curious. The FmgrBuiltin struct includes the "strict" flag, so
> > that would "lock down the value" of the strict flag, wouldn't it?
>
> It does, but that's much more directly a property of the function's
> C code than parallel-safety is.

I'm not sure I agree with that, but I think having the "strict" flag
in FmgrBuiltin isn't that nice either.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: decoupling table and index vacuum
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests