On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Painting it as the unilateral actions of one committer is uncharitable,
> at best.
As I see it, it is just stating the facts. There were several emails
from other committers on the pg_audit thread not that long before it
was committed, and zero of them were supportive. None of them were
dead-set against it, but it is not our typical way of doing business
to press forward with committing something when that many doubts have
been expressed. I believe you will struggle to find comparable
examples involving other patches.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
