Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobQ0apmp=3+e5s2OSNPF=J6Ff=fFLomEHuqDBrYwD4MRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence  (Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>)
Responses Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c:2255: indent with spaces.
>> +        else
>> src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c:2267: indent with spaces.
>> +            break
>
>
> Not sure how that happened! Attached is the updated patch.

This is a performance patch, so it should come with benchmark results
demonstrating that it accomplishes its intended purpose.  I don't see
any.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: new unicode table border styles for psql