On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:25 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I don't see a valid reason for that though - if anything it's dangerous,
> because we're not persistently saving the slot. It should fail the
> checkpoint imo. Robert, do you have an idea?
Well, the comment atop SaveSlotToPath says:
* This needn't actually be part of a checkpoint, but it's a convenient
* location.
And I agree with that.
Incidentally, the wait-event handling in SaveSlotToPath() doesn't look
right for the early-exit cases either.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
