Re: Waits monitoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Waits monitoring
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobOXu=KZqyOKU8NBS6YsiJH0KPytoN+KhF+xxFCPT4bxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Waits monitoring  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Generated lwlocknames.[ch] don't have header comment because
> generate-lwlocknames.pl writes them into wrong place.
>
> lmgr/Makefile looks to have some mistakes.

Fixed.

>  - lwlocknames.c is not generated from (or using) lwlocknames.c
>    so the entry "lwlocknames.c: lwlocknames.h" doesn't looks to
>    be appropriate.

I think that's a pretty standard way of handling a case where a single
command generates multiple files.

>  - maintainer-clean in lmgr/Makefile forgets to remove lwlocknames.c.

Fixed.

> Perhaps uncommenting in pg_config_manual.h is left alone.
> (This is not included in the diff below)

Fixed.

And committed.  Thanks for the review, let's see what the buildfarm thinks.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Did we forget to unpin buf in function "revmap_physical_extend" ?