Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Update description of \d[S+] in \? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Update description of \d[S+] in \?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobKAUxLJ+FX=AmhsP0Jzf4KcPiXKEoot7uap-ZLbD6a=g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Update description of \d[S+] in \?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Update description of \d[S+] in \?  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2017/07/13 19:57, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> The description of \d[S+] currently does not mention that it will list
>>> materialized views and foreign tables.  Attached fixes that.
>>>
>>
>> I guess the same change is applicable to the description of \d[S+] NAME as well.
>
> Thanks for the review.  Fixed in the attached.

The problem with this, IMV, is that it makes those lines more than 80
characters, whereas right now they are not.  And that line seems
doomed to get even longer in the future.

Of course, having it be inaccurate is not great either.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v3] pg_progress() SQL function to monitorprogression of long running SQL queries/utilities