Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobJDfSZ2x_vic5ZoheVcJBn-AmnndUs_99vzP9VStnBuA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 5:38 PM Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Or to put it another way, you can't be given a lower sequence number
> than another process that has already written, because that other
> process must have been given a sequence number before it wrote.

OK, that makes sense.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: CF app feature request
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Removing "magic" oids