On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:15 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> When there is a backup_manifest in the database cluster, it's included in
> the backup even when --no-manifest is specified. ISTM that this is problematic
> because the backup_manifest is obviously not valid for the backup.
> So, isn't it better to always exclude the *existing* backup_manifest in the
> cluster from the backup, like backup_label/tablespace_map? Patch attached.
>
> Also I found the typo in the document. Patch attached.
Both patches look good. The second one is definitely a mistake on my
part, and the first one seems like a totally reasonable change.
Thanks!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
