Re: backup manifests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: backup manifests
Date
Msg-id 777d236e-f46c-8099-bb5e-a6e4efc43999@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: backup manifests  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: backup manifests  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: backup manifests  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 2020/04/09 2:35, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:15 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>> When there is a backup_manifest in the database cluster, it's included in
>> the backup even when --no-manifest is specified. ISTM that this is problematic
>> because the backup_manifest is obviously not valid for the backup.
>> So, isn't it better to always exclude the *existing* backup_manifest in the
>> cluster from the backup, like backup_label/tablespace_map? Patch attached.
>>
>> Also I found the typo in the document. Patch attached.
> 
> Both patches look good. The second one is definitely a mistake on my
> part, and the first one seems like a totally reasonable change.
> Thanks!

Thanks for reviewing them! I pushed them.

Please note that the commit messages have not been delivered to
pgsql-committers yet.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: A problem about partitionwise join
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Report error position in partition bound check