Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobFyhhWUcLYOXBwAdEwtgyLG4G-dqx=p-ibhrkFFMtQDA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> It's not a scan, it's not a join and it's not an aggregation so I
> think it needs to be in a new <sect2> as the same level as those
> others.  It's a different kind of thing.

I'm a little skeptical about that idea because I'm not sure it's
really in the same category as far as importance is concerned, but I
don't have a better idea.  Here's a patch.  I'm worried this is too
much technical jargon, but I don't know how to explain it any more
simply.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ildar Musin
Date:
Subject: Re: MAP syntax for arrays
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: MAP syntax for arrays