Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:20 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Well, that's a user error not pg_dump's fault.  Particularly so for hash
> partitioning, where there is no defensible reason to make the partitions
> semantically different.

I am still of the opinion that you're going down a dangerous path of
redefining pg_dump's mission from "dump and restore the database, as
it actually exists" to "dump and restore the database, unless the user
did something that I think is silly".

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com