On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The code the attached patch is touching is from commit 6566133c5.
> I'm not going to blame the bug on that commit, because before that
> we had dependencies on *zero* of the three roles; at least it added
> one on the grantor. But I'm wondering whether Robert thought about
> the other two roles and explicitly rejected making dependencies
> for them, and if so why.
For some reason, I came to the conclusion that it wasn't needed.
Apparently, that was incorrect.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
