On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I would think you need to drop the now-useless lock, and I sure hope
>>> that RangeVarGetRelid does likewise.
>
>> It doesn't currently. The now-useless lock doesn't really hurt
>> anything, aside from taking up space in the lock table.
>
> Well, there are corner cases where the object OID gets reused during
> the lifetime of the transaction, and then the lock *does* do something
> (and what it does would be bad). But taking up extra space in the
> finite-size lock table is sufficient reason IMO to drop the lock.
> It's not like these are performance-critical code paths.
OK.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
