On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 6:23 AM Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> On a quick look at the latest 0001 patch, the following hunk to reset leftover
> flags seems to be unnecessary:
>
> + /*
> + * If some barrier types were not successfully absorbed, we will have
> + * to try again later.
> + */
> + if (!success)
> + {
> + ResetProcSignalBarrierBits(flags);
> + return;
> + }
>
> When the ProcessBarrierPlaceholder() function returns false without an error,
> that barrier flag gets reset within the while loop. The case when it has an
> error, the rest of the flags get reset in the catch block. Correct me if I am
> missing something here.
Good catch. I think you're right. Do you want to update accordingly?
Andres, do you like the new loop better?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
