Re: Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob=4QJAQPx2jPoB2508aYyB2FgM+1XDhN5JTryJBEsCSw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I don't know why you hate to decrease checkpoint interval so much
> despite I proposed to do so only during WAL streaming (and
> additionaly allowing it to be optional), we have another and
> enough reason to want *to be able* to do so. Averaging disk usage
> is not a trivial issue for some users or - I suppose (or hope?) -
> not a few users. This is a subject not only of resource limit but
> also of operation management.

I agree.  I think there should be a way to do this.  I see the problem
with the proposed patch, but I think that means we need a better idea,
not that the problem is unimportant.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql