Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: EXEC_BACKEND vs bgworkers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: EXEC_BACKEND vs bgworkers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob9o+C===JQBTtGfL+GbFHR3O_a-E=tQLdY-eyUkyizQw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: EXEC_BACKEND vs bgworkers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: EXEC_BACKEND vs bgworkers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think doing nothing is fine.  Given the lack of complaints, we're
> more likely to break something than fix anything useful.

+1.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel scan with SubTransGetTopmostTransaction assert coredump
Next
From: Nitin Jadhav
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)