Re: Assert failure on running a completed portal again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Assert failure on running a completed portal again
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob9C6Pu1Nhv6SWHRB_5MbsOo7KaGcNddouf4e7+gr5vHQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Assert failure on running a completed portal again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 4:45 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Anyway, if you feel like rewriting that stuff, step right up.
> My feeling about it is that the law of conservation of cruft
> will prevent a replacement from being all that much cleaner,
> but maybe I'm wrong.

Thanks for the thoughts. It's always good to get your perspective on
stuff like this, or at least I find it so.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM cleaning of CF 2024-11
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: connection establishment versus parallel workers