On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:25 AM Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, I don't see a reason to back-patch a change like this
>
> Maybe we should consider backporting at least 0001 patch, partially
> perhaps? I believe if fixes pretty cursed pieces of code, e.g:
>
> ```
> pg_cryptohash_ctx *context =
> - (pg_cryptohash_ctx *) PointerGetDatum(foundres);
> + (pg_cryptohash_ctx *) DatumGetPointer(foundres);
> ```
Sure, back-porting the bug fixes would make sense to me.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com