Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob6euOYrg0h10EG3yFPMSU=DhiDAepvgD=E1egLOLHfSQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to createuser --memeber and PG 16  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 1:33 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> This seems like it will be forever confusing to people.  I frankly don't
> know why --role matching CREATE ROLE ... ROLE IN was not already
> confusing in pre-PG 16.  Any new ideas for improvement?

Yeah, it's a bad situation. I think --role is basically misnamed.
Something like --add-to-group would have been clearer, but that also
has the problem of being inconsistent with the SQL command. The whole
ROLE vs. IN ROLE thing is inherently quite confusing, I think. It's
very easy to get confused about which direction the membership arrows
are pointing.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Should CSV parsing be stricter about mid-field quotes?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: v16 regression - wrong query results with LEFT JOINs + join removal