Re: Large object + FREEZE? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Large object + FREEZE?
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob6ViH=hT6Vtn2v8xuAVbWP93f8RokX270B4kC82fyA+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Large object + FREEZE?  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Large object + FREEZE?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Now that we have COPY FREEZE, I'm thinking about adding similar option
> to creating large objects. In 9.3 the maximum size of large objects
> are increased. That means, the first access to a large object will
> trigger more writes because of hint bit updation. Also subsequent
> VACUUM may trigger that as well. If we could freeze arge objects while
> creating, it could reduce the writes dramatically as COPY FREEZE
> already does.
>
> Opinions?

COPY FREEZE only works if the table was created in the same
transaction.  Otherwise, an error midway through could leave the table
and index inconsistent.  I think that's a killer for this proposal,
because obviously when a large object is created, pg_largeobject will
be pre-existing.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: signed vs. unsigned in plpy_procedure.c
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom gucs visibility