On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:34 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Anyhow, this whole thread has struck me as a good reason to polish those
> patches off and add on top of them an extended checksum ability, first,
> independent of TDE, and remove the dependency of those patches from the
> TDE effort and instead allow it to just leverage that ability. I still
> suspect we'll have some folks who will want TDE w/o a per-page nonce and
> that could be an option but we'd be able to support TDE w/ integrity
> pretty easily, which would be fantastic.
Yes, I like that idea. Once we get beyond feature freeze, perhaps we
can try to coordinate to avoid duplication of effort -- or absence of
effort.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
