Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob3w3WmNLV88ck7B3an0VX-Hr+J=bsg_LP3yjCQV5_j-w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:34 AM Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > And then you have to decide what to do about other background
> > transactions.
>
> Not count them if they're implementation details; otherwise count them.
> For example, IMO autovacuum transactions should definitely be counted
> (as one transaction, even if they run parallel vacuum).

Hmm, interesting.  autovacuum isn't an implementation detail?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Special role for subscriptions
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: insensitive collations