Re: Parallel Append implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Parallel Append implementation
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob3iQFVikFhd5k8EcsCDgmZuMTFgkSXONx0jeYvhW4dbQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation  (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I'm afraid this is too late for v10 - do you agree?

Yeah, I think so.  The benefit of this will be a lot more once we get
partitionwise join and partitionwise aggregate working, but that
probably won't happen for this release, or at best in limited cases.
And while we might not agree on exactly what work this patch still
needs, I think it does still need some work.  I've moved this to the
next CommitFest.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: background sessions