On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Well, most of the potential usecases for dsmhash I've heard about so
> far, don't actually benefit much from incremental growth. In nearly all
> the implementations I've seen incremental move ends up requiring more
> total cycles than doing it at once, and for parallelism type usecases
> the stall isn't really an issue. So yes, I think this is something
> worth considering. If we were to actually use DHT for shared caches or
> such, this'd be different, but that seems darned far off.
I think it'd be pretty interesting to look at replacing parts of the
stats collector machinery with something DHT-based.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
