Re: A few new options for vacuumdb - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: A few new options for vacuumdb
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob2e_bWotweV9q3280LX=Nd6PC36=mBG7hSihjeoUwn5A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A few new options for vacuumdb  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:05 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > It does not seem clear whether the user wants us to process mytable
> > only if it is at least 1 GB, or if we should process mytable in
> > addition to any other relations over 1 GB.  Either way, I think trying
> > to support these combinations of options adds more complexity than it
> > is worth.
>
> It seems to me that a combination of both options means that the listed
> table should be processed only if its minimum size is 1GB.  If multiple
> tables are specified with --table, then only those reaching 1GB would be
> processed.

+1.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve selectivity estimate for range queries