Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob1xt7b5gn0s_D2TvDsJ84+Ek9_q_+8W6Xqu5Q9D-M85w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:02 PM Pavel Biryukov <79166341370@yandex.ru> wrote:
> I just want to point that Npgsql provider for .Net Core builds queries like that (RETURNING xmin) to keep track for
concurrency.
> This bug stops us from moving to partitioned tables in Postgres 12 with Npgsql.

That's certainly a good reason to try to make it work. And we can make
it work, if we're willing to assume that everything's a heap table.
But at some point, that hopefully won't be true any more, and then
this whole idea becomes pretty dubious. I think we shouldn't wait
until it happens to start thinking about that problem.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)