Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob+VYjraqoaOa505OR=NON9tW5Gk8iXN2rMcb2hcBrF5Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?  ("Rader, David" <davidr@openscg.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?  ("Rader, David" <davidr@openscg.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Rader, David <davidr@openscg.com> wrote:
> Attached is a doc patch that updates the documentation for postgres-fdw to
> include the actual values for the 4 session variables that are set. Does
> that make sense to clarify?

From my point of view, this would be a sensible thing to document,
although I feel like the grammar is not quite right, because after
"establishes remote session settings for the parameters" my brain
expects a list of parameters rather than a list of parameters and the
corresponding values.  I think it reads better if you change "for the
parameters" to "for various parameters".

</nitpicking>

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability