Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob+74s0xascJ3z+v5B+a+3b51NK9Lyd2gWD7x_RUUNEJQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual  (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I confirmed that an epqtuple of foreign parameterized scan is
> correctly rejected by fdw_recheck_quals with modified outer
> tuple.
>
> I have no objection to this and have two humble comments.
>
> In file_fdw.c, the comment for the last parameter just after the
> added line seems to be better to be aligned with other comments.

I've pgindented the file.  Any other space we might choose would just
be changed by the next pgindent run, so there's no point in trying to
vary.

> In subselect.c, the added break is in the added curly-braces but
> it would be better to place it after the closing brace, like the
> other cases.

Changed that, and committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robbie Harwood
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] GSSAPI encryption support
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt