On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Of course. It's also a heck of a lot more flexible. Adding on another
> ad-hoc option that does the minimum possible amount of work needed to
> address one specific problem is always going to be less work; but after
> we repeat that process five or ten times, we're going to have a mess.
Well, I still like Masahiko-san's proposal, but I'm not prepared to
keep arguing about it right now. Maybe some other people will weigh
in with an opinion.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company