Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoawAO_FK8ZwMtZQWRZUDWXAL3oOOADvVQjJtNt4sHr9Jw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Of course.  It's also a heck of a lot more flexible.  Adding on another
> ad-hoc option that does the minimum possible amount of work needed to
> address one specific problem is always going to be less work; but after
> we repeat that process five or ten times, we're going to have a mess.

Well, I still like Masahiko-san's proposal, but I'm not prepared to
keep arguing about it right now.  Maybe some other people will weigh
in with an opinion.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Macros bundling RELKIND_* conditions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table