Re: [HACKERS] the need to finish - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] the need to finish
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoath=yAhiL-7HMcdKe5jJ07yYPfts+Sym==mVZLDbwcaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] the need to finish  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 12 April 2017 at 16:26, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> writes:
>>> Logical replication emits logmessages like these:
>>> DETAIL:  90 transactions need to finish.
>>> I would prefer the line to be more terse:
>>> DETAIL:  90 transactions to finish.
>> Our style guidelines say that detail messages should be complete
>> sentences, so I don't like your proposal too much.
>> Maybe "N transactions remain to finish." ?
> waiting for N transactions to complete

+1 for something along those lines, but perhaps it needs a capital
letter and a period.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] ERROR: badly formatted node string "RESTRICTINFO...