Re: Gather performance analysis - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Gather performance analysis
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoasscU6RbLdJrf6Pny8EBb1gaOpu9Tipgf1nHTMo7tvVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Gather performance analysis  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Gather performance analysis  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 2:06 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I am attaching both the patches in case you want to play around.

I don't really see any reason not to commit 0001. Perhaps some very
minor grammatical nitpicking is in order here, but apart from that I
can't really see anything to criticize with this approach. It seems
safe enough, it's not invasive in any way that matters, and we have
benchmark results showing that it works well. If someone comes up with
something even better, no harm done, we can always change it again.

Objections?

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Recent cpluspluscheck failures
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Allow queries in WHEN expression of FOR EACH STATEMENT triggers