Re: Accommodate startup process in a separate ProcState array slot instead of in MaxBackends slots. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Accommodate startup process in a separate ProcState array slot instead of in MaxBackends slots.
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoarpX4e7OgmYpWebanpfafTA01CXyKN7q7roKKYnkLeeg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Accommodate startup process in a separate ProcState array slot instead of in MaxBackends slots.  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Accommodate startup process in a separate ProcState array slot instead of in MaxBackends slots.  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 2:23 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks. It makes sense to put the comment in SInvalShmemSize.
> Attaching v2 patch. Please review it.

How about this version, which I have edited lightly for grammar?

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON: functions