Re: pgsql: Support Parallel Append plan nodes. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pgsql: Support Parallel Append plan nodes.
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoarQFvpztuNH=VLNcs9gV1Wapyx_OEHMtmQT1cgOnBG5Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have not managed to make the regression test cases execute the above
> not-covered case. I could do that with my local test that I have, but
> that test has lots of data, so it is slow, and not suitable for
> regression. In select_parallel.sql, by the time a worker w1 gets into
> the function choose_next_subplan_for_worker(), an earlier worker w2
> must have already wrapped around the pa_next_plan at place_2, so this
> worker doesn't get a chance to hit place_1. It's a timing issue. I
> will see if I can solve this.

Well, it seems to me that just running the test case with
parallel_leader_participation = off might be good enough.  It would
hit a decent chunk of this logic, and that's better than what we have
today.  If we're determined to hit the wraparound case the way to do
it is probably to make the first child of the append something that
takes a long time to execute and the second one something quick.  But,
as you say, it's hard to do such things in the regression tests
without making them slow, and I have observed Tom to dislike things
that make the regression tests slow.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Speeding up pg_upgrade
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical replication without a Primary Key