Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication in the same cluster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication in the same cluster
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoapKLtz+NdipRqbs4-34EU0vJ3_8gCmntyzgN_RndRK=Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication in the same cluster  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 26/04/17 18:59, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> ... it just hangs.  My server logs say:
>
>> Yes that's result of how logical replication slots work, the transaction
>> that needs to finish is your transaction. It can be worked around by
>> creating the slot manually via the SQL interface for example and create
>> the subscription using WITH (NOCREATE SLOT, SLOT NAME = 'your slot') .
>
> If that's a predictable deadlock, I think a minimum expectation is that
> the system should notice it and throw an error, not just hang.  (Then
> the error could give a hint about how to work around it.)  But the case
> Bruce has in mind doesn't seem like a crazy use-case to me.  Can't we
> make it "just work"?

+1.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in worker.c