Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaiKeUdLrL=C1gs5JMHyoxVngN9S5X3t_Djz5CbdPtKCQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> What we have now just isn't cutting it for 99% of our users, and we need
> to address that if we are going to ever make any real headway here.
>
> Why can't vacuum handle things automatically like checkpoint smoothing?
> Why can't it detect when it is falling behind and speed up?  Why can't
> it see as busy background writer and slow down?   Unless we answer
> these questions, we are not solving the problem for 99% of our users.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time