Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoafgsbODa=7jcif1JNLiuqSG=j-5mfsTVMM-=o2btytGw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)  (Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 7:37 AM Simon Riggs
<simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Whilte at it, I noticed that we report redo progress for PITR, but we
> > don't report when standby enters archive recovery mode, say due to a
> > failure in the connection to primary or after the promote signal is
> > found. Isn't it useful to report in this case as well to know the
> > recovery progress?
>
> I think your patch disables progress too early, effectively turning
> off the standby progress feature. The purpose was to report on things
> that take long periods during recovery, not just prior to recovery.
>
> I would advocate that we disable progress only while waiting, as I've done here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANbhV-GcWjZ2cmj0uCbZDWQUHnneMi_4EfY3dVWq0-yD5o7Ccg%40mail.gmail.com

Maybe I'm confused here, but I think that, on a standby, startup
progress messages are only printed until the main redo loop is
reached. Otherwise, we would print a message on a standby every 10s
forever, which seems like a thing that most users would not like. So I
think that Bharath has the right idea here.

I don't think that his patch is right in detail, though. I don't think
the call to disable_timeout() needs to be conditional, and I don't
think the Assert is correct. Also, I think that your patch has the
right idea in encapsulating the disable_timeout() call inside a new
function disable_startup_progress_timeout(), rather than having the
details known directly by xlogrecovery.c.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity