Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoafOs4jMU9=JhNcwmBfajVhckKk6fij_a7S2TcBHRKqpg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 5:00 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> If there is some material harm from compiling with multithreading
> support even if you're not using it, we should try to fix that. I'm not
> dead set against having a compile-time option, but I don't see the need
> for it at the moment.

Well, OK, so it sounds like I'm outvoted, at least at the moment.
Maybe that will change as more people vote, but for now, that's where
we are. Given that, I suppose we want something more like Tristan's
patch, but with a more extensible syntax. Does that sound right?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: How about using dirty snapshots to locate dependent objects?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Compress ReorderBuffer spill files using LZ4