Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoae8yoVAOVM7PGO5FhLMhN2LL3K3A0iz+4vWuZGWdFisA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation
Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On Saturday, November 26, 2011 09:52:17 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd just as soon keep the fields in a logical order.
> Btw, I don't think the new order is necessarily worse than the old one.

You forget to attach the benchmark results.

My impression is that cache lines on modern hardware are 64 or 128
*bytes*, in which case this wouldn't matter a bit.

But testing is even better than guessing.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation