Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem)
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoae-GpFiu5WS+xhUjBKv4CihBiwJRk8EwqvQ4gxDDC-cQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem)  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem)  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> I could not find out where is the origin of grammer conflicts, although
> it does not conflict with any options within ALTER FUNCTION.
>
> Do you think the idea of ALTER ... NOT LEAKPROOF should be
> integrated within v9.2 timeline also?

Yes.  Did you notice that I attached a patch to make that work?  I'll
commit that today or tomorrow unless someone comes up with a better
solution.

>> I also think we ought to stick create_function_3 into one of the
>> parallel groups in the regression tests, if possible.  Can you
>> investigate that?
>>
> Not yet. This test does not have dependency with other tests,
> so, I'm optimistic to run create_function_3 concurrently.

Me, too.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stats_recovery view
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem)