On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Merlin Moncure (mmoncure@gmail.com) wrote:
>> It's understood that posix_fallocate is faster at this -- the question
>> on the table is 'does this matter in context of postgres?'.
>> Personally I think this patch should go in regardless -- the concerns
>> made IMNSHO are specious.
>
> I've not had a chance to look at this patch, but I tend to agree with
> Merlin.
I also think this is a good idea.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
