Re: parallel explain analyze support not exercised - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: parallel explain analyze support not exercised
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoabt-1M-uU-xbFzGHT_uH_dDPBRX0o8WXxvu+o93dbTTA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel explain analyze support not exercised  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: parallel explain analyze support not exercised  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Please find the attached for the same.
>
>> +-- to increase the parallel query test coverage
>> +EXPLAIN (analyze, timing off, summary off, costs off) SELECT * FROM tenk1;
>> +                         QUERY PLAN
>> +-------------------------------------------------------------
>> + Gather (actual rows=10000 loops=1)
>> +   Workers Planned: 4
>> +   Workers Launched: 4
>> +   ->  Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (actual rows=2000 loops=5)
>> +(4 rows)
>
> Is there an issue that we might not actually be able to start all four
> workers?  Serious question, not rhetorical.

If this is 'make check', then we should have 8 parallel workers
allowed, so if we only do one of these at a time, then I think we're
OK.  But if somebody changes that configuration setting or if it's
'make installcheck', then the configuration could be anything.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables