On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:52 PM Souvik Bhattacherjee <kivuosb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your reply and sorry that I couldn't reply earlier.
> Since I didn't get any response within a couple of days, I took the longer route -- changed the lwlock.h and
lwlock.c
> for accommodating the lw locks for the shared hash table.
>
> I'll describe what I modified in the lwlock.h and lwlock.c and it seems to be working fine. Although I haven't got an
opportunity
> to test it extensively. If you could let me know if I missed out anything that might cause problems later that would
begreat.
Well, I can't really vouch for your code on a quick look, but it
doesn't look insane.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
