On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:45 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Hmm, I'd supposed that the failing test cases were new as of 412ad7a55.
> Now I see they're not, which indeed puts quite a different spin on
> things. Your thought about maybe the server isn't shut down yet is
> interesting --- did 412ad7a55 touch anything about the shutdown
> sequence?
I hate to say "no" because the evidence suggests that the answer might
be "yes" -- but it definitely isn't intending to change anything about
the shutdown sequence. It just introduces a mechanism to backends to
force the checkpointer to delay writing the checkpoint record.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
